Shale and Wall Street: was the decline in natural gas prices orchestrated?
"In 2011, shale mergers and acquisitions (M&A) accounted for $46.5B in deals and became one of the largest profit centers for some Wall Street investment banks. This anomaly bears scrutiny since shale wells were considerably underperforming in dollar terms during this time. Analysts and inv...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Institution: | ETUI-European Trade Union Institute |
| Format: | TEXT |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Energy Policy Forum
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.labourline.org/KENTIKA-19128082124919462649-Shale-and-Wall-Street-was-the-.htm |
| _version_ | 1771659902043815936 |
|---|---|
| author | Rogers, Deborah |
| author_facet | Rogers, Deborah |
| collection | Library items |
| description | "In 2011, shale mergers and acquisitions (M&A) accounted for $46.5B in deals and became one of the largest profit centers for some Wall Street investment banks. This anomaly bears scrutiny since shale wells were considerably underperforming in dollar terms during this time. Analysts and investment bankers, nevertheless, emerged as some of the most vocal proponents of shale exploitation. By ensuring that production continued at a frenzied pace, in spite of poor well performance (in dollar terms), a glut in the market for natural gas resulted and prices were driven to new lows. In 2011, U.S. demand for natural gas was exceeded by supply by a factor of four. It is highly unlikely that market-savvy bankers did not recognize that by overproducing natural gas a glut would occur with a concomitant severe price decline. This price decline, however, opened the door for significant transactional deals worth billions of dollars and thereby secured further large fees for the investment banks involved. In fact, shales became one of the largest profit centers within these banks in their energy M&A portfolios since 2010. The recent natural gas market glut was largely effected through overproduction of natural gas in order to meet financial analyst’s production targets and to provide cash flow to support operators’ imprudent leverage positions. As prices plunged, Wall Street began executing deals to spin assets of troubled shale companies off to larger players in the industry. Such deals deteriorated only months later, resulting in massive write-downs in shale assets. In addition, the banks were instrumental in crafting convoluted financial products such as VPP's (volumetric production payments); and despite of the obvious lack of sophisticated knowledge by many of these investors about the intricacies and risks of shale production, these products were subsequently sold to investors such as pension funds. Further, leases were bundled and flipped on unproved shale fields in much the same way as mortgage-backed securities had been bundled and sold on questionable underlying mortgage assets prior to the economic downturn of 2007." |
| format | TEXT |
| geographic | USA |
| id | 19128082124919462649_d8f2b5fa10c1405c9f500298680f3f27 |
| institution | ETUI-European Trade Union Institute |
| is_hierarchy_id | 19128082124919462649_d8f2b5fa10c1405c9f500298680f3f27 |
| is_hierarchy_title | Shale and Wall Street: was the decline in natural gas prices orchestrated? |
| language | English |
| physical | 30 p. Digital |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | Energy Policy Forum |
| spellingShingle | Rogers, Deborah energy financial market gas investment price production Shale and Wall Street: was the decline in natural gas prices orchestrated? |
| thumbnail | https://www.labourline.org/Image_prev.jpg?Archive=100880292806 |
| title | Shale and Wall Street: was the decline in natural gas prices orchestrated? |
| topic | energy financial market gas investment price production |
| url | https://www.labourline.org/KENTIKA-19128082124919462649-Shale-and-Wall-Street-was-the-.htm |