Safety, courts and crime

"In Australia annually 23 million working days are lost as a result of work-related injury and disease, a statistic that far exceeds lost time through strikes and other forms of industrial action. The costs to employers, workers and the community of workplace illness and injury is estimated at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnstone, Richard
Institution:ETUI-European Trade Union Institute
Format: TEXT
Language:English
Published: Canberra 2002
National Research Centre for OHS Regulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.labourline.org/KENTIKA-19138240124919564229-Safety,-courts-and-crime.htm
Description
Summary:"In Australia annually 23 million working days are lost as a result of work-related injury and disease, a statistic that far exceeds lost time through strikes and other forms of industrial action. The costs to employers, workers and the community of workplace illness and injury is estimated at more than $20 billion each year. Since the Factory and Shops Act 1885, the Victorian parliament has responded to this problem by enacting statutory standards regulating workplace hazards. These statutory standards have been enforced by a state inspectorate, which has used a variety of enforcement strategies ranging from informal methods, such as advice, persuasion, education and warnings, to formal invocation of the criminal law before the Magistrates' Courts (and since 1985, the County Court), as a last resort. Since the 1830s in Britain, and the 1880s in Australia, the Magistrates' Courts have played a major part in the process of examining, constructing and adjudicating all aspects of the OHS offences, particularly the determination of whether an offence has in fact been committed, and the level of punishment to be exacted. Despite the importance of prosecution in an occupational health and safety (OHS) regulatory regime, and the disquiet at the clear inadequacies of prosecution of those contravening OHS statutes, there has been little research into the way in which the courts hear OHS prosecutions. This study aims to fill this gap, and to build my own study of OHS prosecutions in Victoria from 1885-1979. The paper reports on an empirically-based examination of the manner in which the Magistrates' Courts in Victoria, Australia, construct OHS issues when hearing prosecutions for offences under the OHS legislation (the Industrial Safety, Health and Welfare Act 1981 (Vic) (ISHWA) and the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985 (Vic) (OSHA)).7 The study covered the period 1983-1999. The data was drawn from observations of prosecutions, interviews with inspectors prosecutors and magistrates, participant observation of inspectors and prosecutors, and the statistical analysis of case reports."
Physical Description:33 p.
Digital