The case for the shorter work day. Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1915. F.O. Bunting, plaintiff in error, vs. the State of Oregon, defendant in error. Brief for defendant in error. F. Frankfurter, of Counsel for the State of Oregon. Assisted by J. Goldmark, publication secretary, National Consumers' League

Similar Items

• Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman, plaintiffs-in-error, against The United States, defendant-in-error. Brief on behalf of the plaintiffs-in-error. Harry Weinberger, attorney for plaintiffs-in-error
  Published: (n.d.)
• Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman, plaintiffs-in-error, against The United States, defendant-in-error. Brief on behalf of the plaintiffs-in-error. Harry Weinberger, attorney for plaintiffs-in-error
  Published: (n.d.)
• [Oregon Minimum Wage Law] Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1914. Nos. 507 and 508. F.C. Stettler, plaintiff in error, vs. E.V. O'Hara, et al., constituting the industrial welfare commission, defendants in error. E. Simpson, plaintiff en error, vs. E.V. O'Hara, et al. constituting the Industrial Welfare Commission, defendants in error. Brief for defendant in error. L.D. Brandeis, Counsel for Industrial Welfare Commission. Assisted by J. Goldmark, publication secretaru, National Consumers' League
  Published: (n.d.)
• In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the seventh circuit. October term, A.D. 1905. No. 1211. Moses Harmon, plaintiff in error vs. the United States, defendant in error. Error to the district court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Brief and argument for plaintiff in error
  Published: (n.d.)
• In the supreme Court of Tennessee. [...]. Assignments of error, brief and argument of plaintiffs-in-error
  Published: ([1961])