The case for the shorter work day. Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1915. F.O. Bunting, plaintiff in error, vs. the State of Oregon, defendant in error. Brief for defendant in error. F. Frankfurter, of Counsel for the State of Oregon. Assisted by J. Goldmark, publication secretary, National Consumers' League

Reprinted by National Consumers' League.

Bibliographic Details
Institution:International Institute of Social History
Format: TEXT
Published: Young], n.d.
[New York :
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10622/C0E7A7BD-BC17-4771-B888-17B743D3C08C
_version_ 1771405029332221953
collection Books and Brochures on Social History from IISH Library, 1500-2013
dateSpan n.d.
description Reprinted by National Consumers' League.
format TEXT
genre libraryUnit
id bulk_4580D3A4-174D-48F6-AD5C-C63F5C0A7912
institution International Institute of Social History
publishDate n.d.
publisher Young],
[New York :
spellingShingle The case for the shorter work day. Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1915. F.O. Bunting, plaintiff in error, vs. the State of Oregon, defendant in error. Brief for defendant in error. F. Frankfurter, of Counsel for the State of Oregon. Assisted by J. Goldmark, publication secretary, National Consumers' League
title The case for the shorter work day. Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1915. F.O. Bunting, plaintiff in error, vs. the State of Oregon, defendant in error. Brief for defendant in error. F. Frankfurter, of Counsel for the State of Oregon. Assisted by J. Goldmark, publication secretary, National Consumers' League
url http://hdl.handle.net/10622/C0E7A7BD-BC17-4771-B888-17B743D3C08C