In the Supreme Court of Illinois, Northern grand division. March term, A.D. 1887. August Spies et al., plaintiffs in error, vs. the people of the State of Illinois, defendants in error. Error to the Criminal court of Cook County. Brief on the facts for defendants in error. [By] G. Hunt, J.S. Grinnell, G.C. Ingham, a.o

Similar Items

• In the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the seventh circuit. October term, A.D. 1905. No. 1211. Moses Harmon, plaintiff in error vs. the United States, defendant in error. Error to the district court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Brief and argument for plaintiff in error
  Published: (n.d.)
• In the supreme Court of Tennessee. [...]. Assignments of error, brief and argument of plaintiffs-in-error
  Published: ([1961])
• Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman, plaintiffs-in-error, against The United States, defendant-in-error. Brief on behalf of the plaintiffs-in-error. Harry Weinberger, attorney for plaintiffs-in-error
  Published: (n.d.)
• Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman, plaintiffs-in-error, against The United States, defendant-in-error. Brief on behalf of the plaintiffs-in-error. Harry Weinberger, attorney for plaintiffs-in-error
  Published: (n.d.)
• The case for the shorter work day. Supreme Court of the United States. October term, 1915. F.O. Bunting, plaintiff in error, vs. the State of Oregon, defendant in error. Brief for defendant in error. F. Frankfurter, of Counsel for the State of Oregon. Assisted by J. Goldmark, publication secretary, National Consumers' League
  Published: (n.d.)